Review



human monocytic leukemia cell line  (ATCC)


Bioz Verified Symbol ATCC is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol ATCC manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    ATCC human monocytic leukemia cell line
    Human Monocytic Leukemia Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 19995 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human monocytic leukemia cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 19995 article reviews
    human monocytic leukemia cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    99
    ATCC human monocytic leukemia cell line
    Human Monocytic Leukemia Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human monocytic leukemia cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human monocytic leukemia cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Ubigene Biosciences Co Ltd human monocyte cell line thp 1
    EHF promotes lung cancer cell malignancy and M2 macrophage polarization. A549 and H520 cells were transfected with control (Ctrl) or EHF-knockdown (KD-EHF) plasmids. (A-B) Western blot and quantification of EHF protein levels in A549 and H520 cells. (C-D) EdU staining and quantification of EdU + cells in A549 and H520 cells, assessing proliferation. (E-H) Glucose uptake and lactate production assays were conducted using commercial kits to evaluate glycolytic output. (I-J) Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis. (K-L) Transwell assay was employed to examine cell migration. (M − <t>P)</t> <t>THP-1</t> cells were differentiated into THP-1-M0 macrophages with 100 ng/mL PMA for 24 h. Culture supernatants from Ctrl- or KD-EHF–transfected A549 and H520 cells were collected and co-incubated with THP-1-M0 macrophages. (M − N) Flow cytometric analysis was performed to assess the proportion of CD206 + M2-polarized macrophages. (O–P) ELISA was conducted to quantify the secretion of M2-associated cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGFA) in the supernatants of THP-1-M0 macrophages. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.
    Human Monocyte Cell Line Thp 1, supplied by Ubigene Biosciences Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human monocyte cell line thp 1/product/Ubigene Biosciences Co Ltd
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human monocyte cell line thp 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC monocytic cell line thp 1
    FCGR2B expression defines an immunosuppressive TME in HGSOC. (A) ssGSEA-based immune infiltration analysis across 28 immune cell types. Δ = High - Low. (B) CIBERSORT-based macrophage-focused immune deconvolution reveals distinct immune landscapes between FCGR2B -High and FCGR2B -Low tumors. (C) Fluorescence images (scale bar, 50 μm) of FCGR2B (red), CD14 (green), CD68 (yellow), and the corresponding merged image. (D-E) Quantitative analysis of FCGR2B co-localization with CD14 (D) and CD68 (E). Left: box plots comparing co-localization levels between FCGR2B-High and FCGR2B-Low tumors (defined by the median FCGR2B H-score; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Right: scatter plots showing correlations between FCGR2B and marker H-scores across all HGSOC samples (Spearman’s rho). (F) FCGR2B protein expression in HGSOC cell lines (SKOV3 and OVCAR3) and the cell line <t>THP-1,</t> as detected by WB assays. (G) FCGR2B protein expression in THP-1 cells transfected with Si-FCGR2B or control siRNA, as detected by WB assays. (H) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage M2 polarization (CD206⁺/CD68⁺) under SKOV3 (HGSOC) co-culture conditions, assessed by flow cytometry. (I) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage phagocytosis (CD68⁺/CFSE⁺) of SKOV3 cells under co-culture conditions, analyzed by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t -test; exact P values are indicated within the figure ( P = 0.0001, t = 14.35 for H; P = 0.0013, t = 7.976 for I; n =3, df = 4).
    Monocytic Cell Line Thp 1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/monocytic cell line thp 1/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monocytic cell line thp 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC monocytic cell line
    FCGR2B expression defines an immunosuppressive TME in HGSOC. (A) ssGSEA-based immune infiltration analysis across 28 immune cell types. Δ = High - Low. (B) CIBERSORT-based macrophage-focused immune deconvolution reveals distinct immune landscapes between FCGR2B -High and FCGR2B -Low tumors. (C) Fluorescence images (scale bar, 50 μm) of FCGR2B (red), CD14 (green), CD68 (yellow), and the corresponding merged image. (D-E) Quantitative analysis of FCGR2B co-localization with CD14 (D) and CD68 (E). Left: box plots comparing co-localization levels between FCGR2B-High and FCGR2B-Low tumors (defined by the median FCGR2B H-score; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Right: scatter plots showing correlations between FCGR2B and marker H-scores across all HGSOC samples (Spearman’s rho). (F) FCGR2B protein expression in HGSOC cell lines (SKOV3 and OVCAR3) and the cell line <t>THP-1,</t> as detected by WB assays. (G) FCGR2B protein expression in THP-1 cells transfected with Si-FCGR2B or control siRNA, as detected by WB assays. (H) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage M2 polarization (CD206⁺/CD68⁺) under SKOV3 (HGSOC) co-culture conditions, assessed by flow cytometry. (I) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage phagocytosis (CD68⁺/CFSE⁺) of SKOV3 cells under co-culture conditions, analyzed by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t -test; exact P values are indicated within the figure ( P = 0.0001, t = 14.35 for H; P = 0.0013, t = 7.976 for I; n =3, df = 4).
    Monocytic Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/monocytic cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monocytic cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC monocytic cell line thp
    β-adrenergic stimulation of macrophages causes upregulation of profibrotic and downregulation of inflammatory genes via β1-adrenoceptor. ( a ) Experimental <t>setup:</t> <t>THP-1</t> cells were differentiated to macrophages by stimulation with 50 nM PMA for 24 h, followed by stimulation with β-adrenoceptor agonist ISO or PBS (CTRL) in the presence or absence of β1-adrenoceptor antagonist CGP or β2-adrenoceptor antagonist ICI over a period of 72 h with daily stimulations. Cells were harvested and gene expression analysis was conducted for macrophage phenotype markers. ( b ) Arginase 1 (ARG1) and CTGF genes were higher in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was smaller in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. ( c ) CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and CD80 gene expression were significantly smaller in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was higher in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. Data are obtained as duplicates from at least three independent experiments and shown as mean ± SEM. P-value was determined using ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. CTRL=Control group (Stimulation with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)); ISO=Isoprenaline stimulation group; CGP = β1-adrenoceptor inhibitor; ICI = β2-adrenoceptor inhibitor; mRNA=messenger ribonucleic acid; ARG1 = Arginase 1; CTGF=Connective tissue growth factor; CXCL10 = C-X-C motif chemokine 10; CD=cluster of differentiation.
    Monocytic Cell Line Thp, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/monocytic cell line thp/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monocytic cell line thp - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    ATCC monocytic thp 1 cell line
    β-adrenergic stimulation of macrophages causes upregulation of profibrotic and downregulation of inflammatory genes via β1-adrenoceptor. ( a ) Experimental <t>setup:</t> <t>THP-1</t> cells were differentiated to macrophages by stimulation with 50 nM PMA for 24 h, followed by stimulation with β-adrenoceptor agonist ISO or PBS (CTRL) in the presence or absence of β1-adrenoceptor antagonist CGP or β2-adrenoceptor antagonist ICI over a period of 72 h with daily stimulations. Cells were harvested and gene expression analysis was conducted for macrophage phenotype markers. ( b ) Arginase 1 (ARG1) and CTGF genes were higher in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was smaller in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. ( c ) CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and CD80 gene expression were significantly smaller in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was higher in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. Data are obtained as duplicates from at least three independent experiments and shown as mean ± SEM. P-value was determined using ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. CTRL=Control group (Stimulation with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)); ISO=Isoprenaline stimulation group; CGP = β1-adrenoceptor inhibitor; ICI = β2-adrenoceptor inhibitor; mRNA=messenger ribonucleic acid; ARG1 = Arginase 1; CTGF=Connective tissue growth factor; CXCL10 = C-X-C motif chemokine 10; CD=cluster of differentiation.
    Monocytic Thp 1 Cell Line, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/monocytic thp 1 cell line/product/ATCC
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    monocytic thp 1 cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    EHF promotes lung cancer cell malignancy and M2 macrophage polarization. A549 and H520 cells were transfected with control (Ctrl) or EHF-knockdown (KD-EHF) plasmids. (A-B) Western blot and quantification of EHF protein levels in A549 and H520 cells. (C-D) EdU staining and quantification of EdU + cells in A549 and H520 cells, assessing proliferation. (E-H) Glucose uptake and lactate production assays were conducted using commercial kits to evaluate glycolytic output. (I-J) Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis. (K-L) Transwell assay was employed to examine cell migration. (M − P) THP-1 cells were differentiated into THP-1-M0 macrophages with 100 ng/mL PMA for 24 h. Culture supernatants from Ctrl- or KD-EHF–transfected A549 and H520 cells were collected and co-incubated with THP-1-M0 macrophages. (M − N) Flow cytometric analysis was performed to assess the proportion of CD206 + M2-polarized macrophages. (O–P) ELISA was conducted to quantify the secretion of M2-associated cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGFA) in the supernatants of THP-1-M0 macrophages. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Journal: Regenerative Therapy

    Article Title: Lung cancer cell-derived exosomal EHF drives M2 macrophage polarization via transcriptional activation of RNF41 to promote tumor progression

    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2026.101104

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EHF promotes lung cancer cell malignancy and M2 macrophage polarization. A549 and H520 cells were transfected with control (Ctrl) or EHF-knockdown (KD-EHF) plasmids. (A-B) Western blot and quantification of EHF protein levels in A549 and H520 cells. (C-D) EdU staining and quantification of EdU + cells in A549 and H520 cells, assessing proliferation. (E-H) Glucose uptake and lactate production assays were conducted using commercial kits to evaluate glycolytic output. (I-J) Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis. (K-L) Transwell assay was employed to examine cell migration. (M − P) THP-1 cells were differentiated into THP-1-M0 macrophages with 100 ng/mL PMA for 24 h. Culture supernatants from Ctrl- or KD-EHF–transfected A549 and H520 cells were collected and co-incubated with THP-1-M0 macrophages. (M − N) Flow cytometric analysis was performed to assess the proportion of CD206 + M2-polarized macrophages. (O–P) ELISA was conducted to quantify the secretion of M2-associated cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGFA) in the supernatants of THP-1-M0 macrophages. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Article Snippet: Human monocyte cell line (THP-1) (Catalog #: YC-D011) were purchased from Guangzhou Ubigene Biosciences Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) and cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Gibco).

    Techniques: Transfection, Control, Knockdown, Western Blot, Staining, Transwell Assay, Migration, Incubation, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay

    Exosomes derived from lung cancer cells are internalized by THP-1-M0 macrophages and mediate EHF delivery. Exosomes were isolated from A549 and H520 cells. (A) TEM images showed the typical cup-shaped morphology of exosomes isolated from A549 and H520 cell supernatants (scale bar: 100 nm). (B) NTA of exosomes from A549 and H520 cells. (C) Western blot analysis of exosome markers (CD9 and TSG101) and the endoplasmic reticulum marker Calnexin in exosome lysates and parental A549/H520 cell lysates. (D-E) THP-1-M0 macrophages (differentiated from THP-1 cells with 100 ng/mL PMA for 24 h) were co-incubated with DiI-labeled exosomes isolated from A549 and H520 cells. (D) Fluorescence microscopy images of THP-1-M0 macrophages after co-incubation with PKH67-labeled exosomes (scale bar: 20 μm). (E-F) Western blot and quantification of EHF protein levels in THP-1-M0 macrophages after incubation with exosomes from A549 or H520 cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Journal: Regenerative Therapy

    Article Title: Lung cancer cell-derived exosomal EHF drives M2 macrophage polarization via transcriptional activation of RNF41 to promote tumor progression

    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2026.101104

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Exosomes derived from lung cancer cells are internalized by THP-1-M0 macrophages and mediate EHF delivery. Exosomes were isolated from A549 and H520 cells. (A) TEM images showed the typical cup-shaped morphology of exosomes isolated from A549 and H520 cell supernatants (scale bar: 100 nm). (B) NTA of exosomes from A549 and H520 cells. (C) Western blot analysis of exosome markers (CD9 and TSG101) and the endoplasmic reticulum marker Calnexin in exosome lysates and parental A549/H520 cell lysates. (D-E) THP-1-M0 macrophages (differentiated from THP-1 cells with 100 ng/mL PMA for 24 h) were co-incubated with DiI-labeled exosomes isolated from A549 and H520 cells. (D) Fluorescence microscopy images of THP-1-M0 macrophages after co-incubation with PKH67-labeled exosomes (scale bar: 20 μm). (E-F) Western blot and quantification of EHF protein levels in THP-1-M0 macrophages after incubation with exosomes from A549 or H520 cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Article Snippet: Human monocyte cell line (THP-1) (Catalog #: YC-D011) were purchased from Guangzhou Ubigene Biosciences Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) and cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Gibco).

    Techniques: Derivative Assay, Isolation, Western Blot, Marker, Incubation, Labeling, Fluorescence, Microscopy

    Exosomal EHF reprograms THP-1-M0 macrophages to promote lung cancer cell malignancy and angiogenesis via paracrine signaling. (A) Schematic of the paracrine co-culture system: Exosomes from control (Ctrl) or EHF-knockdown (KD-EHF) A549/H520 cells were co-incubated with THP-1-M0 macrophages. The medium from these macrophages was used to treat A549/H520 cells or HUVECs. (B-E) THP-1-M0 macrophages were treated with three conditions: blank control (no exosome), exosomes from control-transfected A549/H520 cells (Exo Ctrl ), or exosomes from EHF-knockdown A549/H520 cells (Exo KD−EHF ). (B–C) Flow cytometry analysis of CD206 + M2 macrophage proportions in THP-1-M0 cells. (D-E) ELISA measurement of M2-associated cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGFA). (F-M) The medium from exosome treated macrophages was then used to incubate A549/H520 cells or HUVECs. (F-G) EdU staining and quantification of EdU + proliferating A549 and H520 cells. (H–I) Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis in A549 and H520 cells. (J-K) Transwell migration assays and quantification of migrated A549 and H520 cells. (L-M) Tube formation assays and quantification of tube numbers in HUVECs. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Journal: Regenerative Therapy

    Article Title: Lung cancer cell-derived exosomal EHF drives M2 macrophage polarization via transcriptional activation of RNF41 to promote tumor progression

    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2026.101104

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Exosomal EHF reprograms THP-1-M0 macrophages to promote lung cancer cell malignancy and angiogenesis via paracrine signaling. (A) Schematic of the paracrine co-culture system: Exosomes from control (Ctrl) or EHF-knockdown (KD-EHF) A549/H520 cells were co-incubated with THP-1-M0 macrophages. The medium from these macrophages was used to treat A549/H520 cells or HUVECs. (B-E) THP-1-M0 macrophages were treated with three conditions: blank control (no exosome), exosomes from control-transfected A549/H520 cells (Exo Ctrl ), or exosomes from EHF-knockdown A549/H520 cells (Exo KD−EHF ). (B–C) Flow cytometry analysis of CD206 + M2 macrophage proportions in THP-1-M0 cells. (D-E) ELISA measurement of M2-associated cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGFA). (F-M) The medium from exosome treated macrophages was then used to incubate A549/H520 cells or HUVECs. (F-G) EdU staining and quantification of EdU + proliferating A549 and H520 cells. (H–I) Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis in A549 and H520 cells. (J-K) Transwell migration assays and quantification of migrated A549 and H520 cells. (L-M) Tube formation assays and quantification of tube numbers in HUVECs. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Article Snippet: Human monocyte cell line (THP-1) (Catalog #: YC-D011) were purchased from Guangzhou Ubigene Biosciences Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) and cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Gibco).

    Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Control, Knockdown, Incubation, Transfection, Flow Cytometry, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Staining, Migration

    EHF transcriptionally activates RNF41 and mediates its intercellular transfer via exosomes. (A) JASPAR database prediction of the EHF-binding motif within the RNF41 promoter region, localized to positions −828/-821. (B) ChIP-qPCR analysis in THP-1-M0 macrophages. (C) Dual-luciferase reporter assays in 293T cells. (D) WB analysis of EHF protein levels in THP-1-M0 macrophages with EHF knockdown (KD-EHF) or control (Ctrl). (E-F) Western blot and qRT-PCR analysis of RNF41 protein and mRNA levels in THP-1-M0 macrophages with KD-EHF or Ctrl. (G-H) THP-1-M0 macrophages were treated with culture medium (Blank), control exosomes (Ctrl Exo, from A549/H520 cells), or EHF-knockdown exosomes (KD-EHF Exo, from A549/H520-KD-EHF cells). RNF41 protein levels were detected by Western blot. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Journal: Regenerative Therapy

    Article Title: Lung cancer cell-derived exosomal EHF drives M2 macrophage polarization via transcriptional activation of RNF41 to promote tumor progression

    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2026.101104

    Figure Lengend Snippet: EHF transcriptionally activates RNF41 and mediates its intercellular transfer via exosomes. (A) JASPAR database prediction of the EHF-binding motif within the RNF41 promoter region, localized to positions −828/-821. (B) ChIP-qPCR analysis in THP-1-M0 macrophages. (C) Dual-luciferase reporter assays in 293T cells. (D) WB analysis of EHF protein levels in THP-1-M0 macrophages with EHF knockdown (KD-EHF) or control (Ctrl). (E-F) Western blot and qRT-PCR analysis of RNF41 protein and mRNA levels in THP-1-M0 macrophages with KD-EHF or Ctrl. (G-H) THP-1-M0 macrophages were treated with culture medium (Blank), control exosomes (Ctrl Exo, from A549/H520 cells), or EHF-knockdown exosomes (KD-EHF Exo, from A549/H520-KD-EHF cells). RNF41 protein levels were detected by Western blot. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Article Snippet: Human monocyte cell line (THP-1) (Catalog #: YC-D011) were purchased from Guangzhou Ubigene Biosciences Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) and cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Gibco).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, ChIP-qPCR, Luciferase, Knockdown, Control, Western Blot, Quantitative RT-PCR

    RNF41 mediates exosomal EHF-driven pro-tumorigenic effects in lung cancer. (A) Schematic of the rescue co-culture system: THP-1-M0 macrophages (control or RNF41-overexpressing) were incubated with exosomes from control (Exo Ctrl ) or EHF-knockdown (Exo KD−EHF ) A549/H520 cells. The medium from these co-cultures was used to treat A549/H520 cells or HUVECs. (B–C) Flow cytometry was used to analyze the proportion of CD206 + M2-polarized macrophages in THP-1-M0 cells. (D-E) ELISA was employed to quantify the levels of M2-associated cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGFA) in the CM from macrophages. (F-G) EdU assays were carried out to measure the proliferation of A549 and H520 cells. (H–I) Annexin V/PI flow cytometry was used to assess the apoptosis of A549 and H520 cells treated with CM. (J-K) Transwell assays were performed to evaluate the migration of A549 and H520 cells. (L-M) Tube formation assays were conducted on HUVECs treated with CM. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Journal: Regenerative Therapy

    Article Title: Lung cancer cell-derived exosomal EHF drives M2 macrophage polarization via transcriptional activation of RNF41 to promote tumor progression

    doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2026.101104

    Figure Lengend Snippet: RNF41 mediates exosomal EHF-driven pro-tumorigenic effects in lung cancer. (A) Schematic of the rescue co-culture system: THP-1-M0 macrophages (control or RNF41-overexpressing) were incubated with exosomes from control (Exo Ctrl ) or EHF-knockdown (Exo KD−EHF ) A549/H520 cells. The medium from these co-cultures was used to treat A549/H520 cells or HUVECs. (B–C) Flow cytometry was used to analyze the proportion of CD206 + M2-polarized macrophages in THP-1-M0 cells. (D-E) ELISA was employed to quantify the levels of M2-associated cytokines (TGF-β1, IL-10, and VEGFA) in the CM from macrophages. (F-G) EdU assays were carried out to measure the proliferation of A549 and H520 cells. (H–I) Annexin V/PI flow cytometry was used to assess the apoptosis of A549 and H520 cells treated with CM. (J-K) Transwell assays were performed to evaluate the migration of A549 and H520 cells. (L-M) Tube formation assays were conducted on HUVECs treated with CM. Data are presented as mean ± SD. P < 0.05 denotes statistical significance.

    Article Snippet: Human monocyte cell line (THP-1) (Catalog #: YC-D011) were purchased from Guangzhou Ubigene Biosciences Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) and cultured in RPMI-1640 (Gibco) containing 10% FBS (Gibco).

    Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, Control, Incubation, Knockdown, Flow Cytometry, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Migration

    FCGR2B expression defines an immunosuppressive TME in HGSOC. (A) ssGSEA-based immune infiltration analysis across 28 immune cell types. Δ = High - Low. (B) CIBERSORT-based macrophage-focused immune deconvolution reveals distinct immune landscapes between FCGR2B -High and FCGR2B -Low tumors. (C) Fluorescence images (scale bar, 50 μm) of FCGR2B (red), CD14 (green), CD68 (yellow), and the corresponding merged image. (D-E) Quantitative analysis of FCGR2B co-localization with CD14 (D) and CD68 (E). Left: box plots comparing co-localization levels between FCGR2B-High and FCGR2B-Low tumors (defined by the median FCGR2B H-score; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Right: scatter plots showing correlations between FCGR2B and marker H-scores across all HGSOC samples (Spearman’s rho). (F) FCGR2B protein expression in HGSOC cell lines (SKOV3 and OVCAR3) and the cell line THP-1, as detected by WB assays. (G) FCGR2B protein expression in THP-1 cells transfected with Si-FCGR2B or control siRNA, as detected by WB assays. (H) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage M2 polarization (CD206⁺/CD68⁺) under SKOV3 (HGSOC) co-culture conditions, assessed by flow cytometry. (I) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage phagocytosis (CD68⁺/CFSE⁺) of SKOV3 cells under co-culture conditions, analyzed by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t -test; exact P values are indicated within the figure ( P = 0.0001, t = 14.35 for H; P = 0.0013, t = 7.976 for I; n =3, df = 4).

    Journal: Translational Oncology

    Article Title: Unmasking FCGR2B as a high-grade serous ovarian cancer specific marker of immune suppression and tumor progression through multi-omics mining

    doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2026.102748

    Figure Lengend Snippet: FCGR2B expression defines an immunosuppressive TME in HGSOC. (A) ssGSEA-based immune infiltration analysis across 28 immune cell types. Δ = High - Low. (B) CIBERSORT-based macrophage-focused immune deconvolution reveals distinct immune landscapes between FCGR2B -High and FCGR2B -Low tumors. (C) Fluorescence images (scale bar, 50 μm) of FCGR2B (red), CD14 (green), CD68 (yellow), and the corresponding merged image. (D-E) Quantitative analysis of FCGR2B co-localization with CD14 (D) and CD68 (E). Left: box plots comparing co-localization levels between FCGR2B-High and FCGR2B-Low tumors (defined by the median FCGR2B H-score; Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Right: scatter plots showing correlations between FCGR2B and marker H-scores across all HGSOC samples (Spearman’s rho). (F) FCGR2B protein expression in HGSOC cell lines (SKOV3 and OVCAR3) and the cell line THP-1, as detected by WB assays. (G) FCGR2B protein expression in THP-1 cells transfected with Si-FCGR2B or control siRNA, as detected by WB assays. (H) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage M2 polarization (CD206⁺/CD68⁺) under SKOV3 (HGSOC) co-culture conditions, assessed by flow cytometry. (I) Effect of FCGR2B knockdown on macrophage phagocytosis (CD68⁺/CFSE⁺) of SKOV3 cells under co-culture conditions, analyzed by flow cytometry. Statistical significance was determined using a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t -test; exact P values are indicated within the figure ( P = 0.0001, t = 14.35 for H; P = 0.0013, t = 7.976 for I; n =3, df = 4).

    Article Snippet: The HGSOC cell lines SK-OV-3 (ATCC® HTB-77TM) and OVCAR-3 (ATCC® HTB-161TM), as well as the human monocytic cell line THP-1 (ATCC® TIB-202TM), were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured under standard conditions at 37 °C with 5% CO2.

    Techniques: Expressing, Fluorescence, Marker, Transfection, Control, Knockdown, Co-Culture Assay, Flow Cytometry, Two Tailed Test

    β-adrenergic stimulation of macrophages causes upregulation of profibrotic and downregulation of inflammatory genes via β1-adrenoceptor. ( a ) Experimental setup: THP-1 cells were differentiated to macrophages by stimulation with 50 nM PMA for 24 h, followed by stimulation with β-adrenoceptor agonist ISO or PBS (CTRL) in the presence or absence of β1-adrenoceptor antagonist CGP or β2-adrenoceptor antagonist ICI over a period of 72 h with daily stimulations. Cells were harvested and gene expression analysis was conducted for macrophage phenotype markers. ( b ) Arginase 1 (ARG1) and CTGF genes were higher in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was smaller in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. ( c ) CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and CD80 gene expression were significantly smaller in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was higher in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. Data are obtained as duplicates from at least three independent experiments and shown as mean ± SEM. P-value was determined using ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. CTRL=Control group (Stimulation with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)); ISO=Isoprenaline stimulation group; CGP = β1-adrenoceptor inhibitor; ICI = β2-adrenoceptor inhibitor; mRNA=messenger ribonucleic acid; ARG1 = Arginase 1; CTGF=Connective tissue growth factor; CXCL10 = C-X-C motif chemokine 10; CD=cluster of differentiation.

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Renal denervation attenuates cardiac fibrosis and improves left ventricular function in rats with myocardial infarction

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-50195-w

    Figure Lengend Snippet: β-adrenergic stimulation of macrophages causes upregulation of profibrotic and downregulation of inflammatory genes via β1-adrenoceptor. ( a ) Experimental setup: THP-1 cells were differentiated to macrophages by stimulation with 50 nM PMA for 24 h, followed by stimulation with β-adrenoceptor agonist ISO or PBS (CTRL) in the presence or absence of β1-adrenoceptor antagonist CGP or β2-adrenoceptor antagonist ICI over a period of 72 h with daily stimulations. Cells were harvested and gene expression analysis was conducted for macrophage phenotype markers. ( b ) Arginase 1 (ARG1) and CTGF genes were higher in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was smaller in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. ( c ) CXC motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and CD80 gene expression were significantly smaller in ISO compared to CTRL. Compared to ISO, expression was higher in CGP + ISO but not ICI + ISO. Data are obtained as duplicates from at least three independent experiments and shown as mean ± SEM. P-value was determined using ANOVA with Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. CTRL=Control group (Stimulation with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)); ISO=Isoprenaline stimulation group; CGP = β1-adrenoceptor inhibitor; ICI = β2-adrenoceptor inhibitor; mRNA=messenger ribonucleic acid; ARG1 = Arginase 1; CTGF=Connective tissue growth factor; CXCL10 = C-X-C motif chemokine 10; CD=cluster of differentiation.

    Article Snippet: The human monocytic cell line THP-1 was purchased from ATCC (Wesel, Germany).

    Techniques: Gene Expression, Expressing, Control, Saline